Here's some of what the pro ad specialists have been saying about the Permanent High Heels campaign:
Switcha says: "And what would this be an ad for? Or is it an ad?"
falconmusic says: "Ick... ICK ICK ICK... I dont know what the ad might be for... but the image I will have with the brand is groseeeee."
Nobby Styles says: "No. That no good. Do you have a giantess fetish, by any chance?"
digifool says: " Scrap it and start again. I have no idea what it means but I can tell you now, nothing good will come of it."
falconmusic says: "Who is this supposed to appeal to? Women or men? Because both will equate it with pain…"
boyoboyit'sfun says "spelling isn't the only weakness, the idea is weak. I'd offer suggestions for how you might better approach it but I can't even tell what the ad is for."
LEBOW says: "They all missed it because it isn't obvious. Which is its weakness. It has to be understood in mere seconds. It's all about making people go "hmmm....YA!"
...and I eventually got it. It just didn't make me feel anything at all.
So, are you doing a survey on how many clicks and laughs you can accumulate on this site?"
Follow live updates to this controversy here
